DENTAL UPDATE | CLINICAL PUBLICATION

Rethinking Posterior Composite Restorations

The Clark cavity design, anatomical matrices and injection moulding: a modern approach to Class II composite dentistry.

Posterior composite restorations are part of everyday dentistry, yet achieving predictable contacts, appropriate anatomy and durable margins can remain challenging.

In this published Dental Update article, Dr Claire Burgess and Professor Dominic Hassall explore how the Bioclear Method combines contemporary cavity design, anatomical matrices and heated composite injection moulding.

Explore Class II Contacts ↓ Download Original Article ↗
Posterior composite restoration using the Bioclear Method
Posterior composite dentistry
Clinical photograph from the existing Bioclear UK article, illustrating posterior restoration anatomy.

The Challenges of Posterior Composite Dentistry

As the use of amalgam has declined, composite restorations have become increasingly important in posterior dentistry. However, replacing amalgam with composite requires more than simply changing materials.

01

Open or Weak Contacts

Inadequate proximal contact formation can contribute to food impaction and periodontal irritation.

02

Marginal Deterioration

Poor adaptation, contamination and finishing difficulties may contribute to marginal staining and deterioration.

03

Tooth Fracture

Traditional cavity designs and extensive loss of tooth structure can leave posterior teeth vulnerable to fracture.

04

Postoperative Sensitivity

Inadequate bonding, curing and restorative adaptation are among the factors that can contribute to sensitivity after treatment.

The central question:
How can clinicians improve the predictability of posterior composite restorations while conserving tooth structure and creating appropriate contact anatomy? The published article explores how contemporary preparation principles and the Bioclear Method can help address these challenges.

The Five Pillars of the Bioclear Method

Bioclear is a complete restorative methodology rather than simply a matrix system or composite placement technique. Its five core principles apply to both anterior and posterior direct restorations.

01

Biofilm Removal

Thorough cleaning of the tooth surfaces, particularly around restoration margins, before adhesive procedures.

02

Modern Cavity Preparation

Conservative preparation designs that consider adhesion, tooth preservation and the mechanical behaviour of the restored tooth.

03

Anatomical Matrices

Transparent matrices designed to assist with proximal contours, emergence profiles and appropriate contact formation.

04

Heated Injection Moulding

Placement of appropriately heated composite materials using a controlled, matrix-guided technique.

05

Rockstar Polishing

A systematic finishing and polishing protocol to create smooth, highly polished restorative surfaces.

Why the complete Method matters
Surface preparation, cavity design, matrix selection, material handling, curing and polishing all influence the final restoration. The article presents these as complementary elements of modern direct composite dentistry.

The Clark Class II Cavity Design

Moving beyond traditional mechanical retention towards preparation designs that work with modern adhesive materials.

Rethinking Traditional Cavity Preparation

Conventional cavity preparation principles were developed around the mechanical requirements of amalgam. These included features designed to retain the restorative material within the tooth.

Adhesive composite dentistry creates an opportunity to reconsider those principles and preserve more healthy tooth structure.

The Clark cavity design, developed by Dr David Clark, incorporates modern preparation concepts such as rounded geometry and radius bevels.

The aim is to improve the relationship between the restoration and the remaining tooth structure while avoiding unnecessary removal of sound tissue.

CONTEMPORARY CAVITY DESIGN

Key Principles

  • Prioritise adhesion rather than traditional mechanical retention.
  • Preserve sound enamel and dentine wherever clinically appropriate.
  • Use rounded preparation geometry and appropriate radius bevels.
  • Consider compression-based restorative joints.
  • Assess remaining cusp thickness, existing cracks and functional loading.
  • Consider direct cuspal coverage when the remaining tooth structure requires protection.

Clinical perspective:
The paper discusses the potential benefits of compression-based preparation principles and conservative cavity design. Restorative decisions must still account for the individual tooth, extent of damage, occlusal loading and available evidence.

Creating Predictable Class II Contacts

One of the most important subjects in the publication is the development of broad, anatomically appropriate proximal contact areas.

THE CLINICAL PROBLEM

Why Contact Anatomy Matters

A successful Class II restoration requires more than simply making the floss feel tight.

The relationship between the proximal contact, marginal ridge, emergence profile and neighbouring tooth must all be considered.

The article identifies several common contact problems.

  • Open contacts that permit food impaction.
  • Small point contacts with inadequate contact area.
  • Proximal overhangs that compromise gingival health.
  • Incorrect marginal ridge position or height.

Anatomical Matrix Systems

The Dental Update article focuses on the Bioclear Biofit anatomical Mylar matrices.

Their shape is designed to help establish an appropriate emergence profile and a longer contact area, rather than a small point contact.

The transparent matrix material also permits curing light access through the matrix.

The complete technique combines matrix selection and seating with appropriate wedging and tooth separation.

This creates the conditions for a controlled injection-moulded Class II restoration.

2026 product update:
The original publication discusses Biofit matrices. Bioclear's newer Evolve posterior matrix range has since expanded the available anatomical shapes and sizes.

FEATURED TECHNIQUE

The Spot Weld: Establishing the Proximal Contact

A particularly useful aspect of the original article is the description of the Spot Weld technique for Class II composite restorations.

Rather than relying on conventional matrix burnishing, Spot Welding uses a small amount of flowable composite to secure the matrix in the intended contact position.

During the technique, the matrix is positioned against the adjacent tooth and stabilised while the flowable composite is cured.

This creates a fixed matrix arrangement that can subsequently be used for composite injection moulding.

Why it matters:
The technique aims to establish the intended contact relationship before the main body of composite is injected. The original publication provides the clinical details of this method.

Read the Spot Weld Technique ↗

A Systematic Approach to Class II Restorations

The publication describes a structured workflow involving preparation design, matrix management and restorative material placement. These seven stages provide an overview of the key considerations.

01

Assessment & Pre-Wedging

Assess the tooth, adjacent contact, cavity depth and remaining tooth structure. Pre-wedging can assist with initial separation and access.

02

Clark Cavity Preparation

Prepare the cavity using appropriate contemporary restorative principles, including conservative preparation geometry.

03

Surface Preparation

Remove biofilm and prepare the tooth surfaces for the selected adhesive restorative protocol.

04

Matrix Selection

Select the anatomical matrix according to tooth shape, cavity depth and the required emergence profile.

05

Wedge & Ring Placement

Seat and stabilise the matrix using the appropriate wedge and separation ring. Confirm matrix fit and marginal ridge position.

06

Spot Weld

Establish and stabilise the intended contact relationship before injection moulding.

07

Injection & Polishing

Complete the selected adhesive and composite placement protocol. Finish and polish the restoration and verify the contact and occlusion.

Clinical training matters.
This overview is not intended as a substitute for the detailed protocols described in the original publication or hands-on training in the Bioclear Method.

Heated Composite Injection Moulding

The Bioclear Method combines anatomical matrices with a controlled composite injection technique. The published article explains the rationale for warming selected restorative materials.

Moving Beyond Traditional Layering

Conventional posterior composite techniques have often used multiple manually adapted increments.

The Bioclear Method uses heated composite materials and a matrix-guided injection technique to create the restoration.

Warming compatible composite materials can reduce viscosity, making the material easier to adapt within the cavity.

The published technique uses a combination of adhesive, flowable composite and paste composite.

Material selection, permitted increment thickness and curing protocols remain essential considerations.

MATERIAL HANDLING

Important Clinical Principles

  • Use composite materials suitable for the selected warming protocol.
  • Follow the manufacturer's recommended handling and curing instructions.
  • Ensure appropriate adaptation at margins and internal cavity surfaces.
  • Respect the material's validated depth of cure.
  • Use an appropriate curing light and curing technique.
  • Complete careful finishing, contact verification and polishing.

Important distinction:
Injection moulding does not remove the need for careful curing, appropriate materials or sound adhesive technique. The reported benefits of material warming and bulk placement depend on the specific restorative system and clinical protocol.

Beyond Class II: Direct Composite Overlays

The publication also considers the role of direct composite overlays when restoring more extensively compromised posterior teeth.

Managing Weakened Cusps and Cracked Teeth

Posterior teeth with large existing restorations, thin remaining cavity walls or visible cracks may require additional cuspal protection.

In appropriate cases, a direct composite overlay can provide an alternative to an indirect restoration.

The aim is to restore tooth structure and function while retaining as much healthy tissue as possible.

The authors discuss the possible advantages of direct cuspal coverage, including additive restorative strategies and treatment delivered without the laboratory stages associated with indirect restorations.

Patient selection, crack assessment, occlusion and remaining tooth structure remain central to the treatment decision.

RESTORATIVE DECISION-MAKING

When Might Cuspal Coverage Be Considered?

  • Extensive existing posterior restorations.
  • Thin or compromised remaining cusps.
  • Selected teeth with cracks or cracked-cusp symptoms.
  • Situations where preserving remaining tooth structure is a primary objective.
  • Cases suitable for direct adhesive restoration following comprehensive clinical assessment.

Further reading:
The Dental Update paper includes clinical examples of both Class II restorations and direct composite overlays, including a cracked mandibular molar treated with cuspal coverage. Refer to the full article for the associated photographs and clinical discussion.

Key Takeaways for Everyday Dentistry

The publication brings together several important principles for clinicians undertaking posterior direct restorations.

01 / PREPARATION

Think Beyond Traditional Cavity Design

Modern adhesive materials allow preparation strategies that prioritise conservation of tooth structure and appropriate restorative geometry.

02 / ANATOMY

Build the Contact Before the Restoration

Appropriate matrix selection, separation and the Spot Weld technique can help establish the intended proximal relationship before injection.

03 / TECHNIQUE

Treat the Method as a Complete System

Biofilm removal, preparation, matrix selection, material handling, curing and polishing all contribute to the restorative outcome.

ORIGINAL PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

Read the Full Dental Update Article

Posterior Composite Restorations including the Clark Cavity Design and Superior Class II Contacts Using a Novel Matrix System: Part 2

Dr Claire Burgess and Professor Dominic Hassall
Dental Update, March 2023
Volume 50, pages 177–186

Frequently Asked Questions

Common clinical questions about the Bioclear approach to posterior composite restorations.

What is the Clark Class II cavity design?

The Clark Class II design uses contemporary adhesive preparation principles, including conservative geometry and radius bevels. It aims to preserve sound tooth structure while considering how the remaining tooth and composite restoration behave under loading.

Why are anatomical matrices important for Class II restorations?

Anatomical matrices help establish the intended proximal contour, emergence profile and contact relationship. Appropriate matrix selection and placement can reduce the risk of open contacts, point contacts and restorative overhangs.

What is the Bioclear Spot Weld technique?

Spot Welding uses flowable composite to stabilise the matrix in the intended contact position before the main composite injection. The technique is described in detail in the original Dental Update publication.

Does heated composite injection moulding eliminate the need for layering?

Suitable materials and clinical situations may permit bulk placement within the manufacturer's recommended depth-of-cure limits. However, some preparations require additional stages, including marginal elevation. The selected restorative materials, cavity depth and curing protocol determine the appropriate approach.

Can Bioclear be used for direct posterior overlays?

Yes. The Bioclear Method can be applied to selected direct composite cuspal overlays. The decision to provide direct cuspal coverage or an indirect restoration depends on the individual clinical circumstances, including crack assessment, remaining tooth structure and functional requirements.

Are the matrices in the 2023 article still current?

The original article discusses Bioclear Biofit matrices. The newer Evolve posterior matrix range has since introduced additional anatomical profiles and matrix options. The underlying principles of matrix-guided restorative anatomy remain relevant.

Where can I learn the Bioclear Method for posterior restorations?

Bioclear Matrix UK provides hands-on education covering posterior Class II restorations, the Bioclear Method, anatomical matrices and injection moulding. Visit the course pages for current Introduction and Core Posterior training options.

Develop Your Posterior Bioclear Skills

Explore hands-on training and the contemporary matrix systems used in the Bioclear Method.

HANDS-ON EDUCATION

Learn the Bioclear Method

Move beyond traditional composite placement techniques with structured hands-on training.

Our Introduction and Core Posterior courses cover anatomical matrices, Class II contacts, modern cavity design and heated composite injection moulding.

Explore Bioclear Courses →
CLINICAL EQUIPMENT

Discover Bioclear Posterior Matrices

Bioclear's anatomical matrix systems are designed to support restorative contours and predictable Class II contacts.

Explore the current Evolve posterior matrix range and learn how the different shapes and sizes are used.

Explore Posterior Matrices →
Back to blog