Modern Cavity Preparations Tucker Gold and Clark Class II by Dr Clark

Author: Dr. David Clark

Download the full article: Click here to download (PDF)

Key Points

Historical Context

Dr. G.V. Black’s cavity preparations, developed in 1896 for amalgam use, became the standard. However, these traditional designs often sacrificed sound tooth structure and contributed to long-term fractures.

Dr. Richard Tucker’s Innovations (1950s–onward)

Dr. Tucker refined gold restoration methods with an emphasis on precision, durability, and enamel preservation:

  • Flaring cavity walls to shift the tooth-restoration interface (TRI) to line angles, allowing gold to be swaged tightly
  • Creating self-cleansing zones for longevity
  • Introducing “Calla Lily”-style flares and radius walls to improve enamel-gold sealing and reduce dentin stress

Clark Class II Preparations for Composite

Inspired by Tucker’s gold techniques, the Clark Class II composite design enhances strength, bonding, and long-term stability:

  • Flared occlusal walls: Redirect occlusal forces perpendicularly to the TRI, reducing marginal breakdown
  • Compression-style joint: Mimics crown-like reinforcement to resist fractures
  • Radius interproximal walls: Maximize the enamel-composite interface for better seal and strength

Illustration of Clark Class II cavity design

Clinical Implications

Modern cavity designs like Clark’s address several key challenges in posterior composites:

  • Reduce microleakage by avoiding high-stress C-factor margins
  • Enhance bonding reliability and reduce failure
  • Minimize fractures caused by outdated prep geometry

Comparison of traditional vs. modern cavity preparation

Summary

Incorporating modern preparation techniques such as Clark Class II aligns with current adhesive dentistry principles. These approaches preserve tooth structure, improve stress distribution, and extend the life of restorations—especially in posterior composite cases.

Read the full article: Click here to download

Back to blog